Witzke Berry & Carter PLLC
Blog Home Firm Website Practice Areas Contact Us

Who Owns Your Facebook Pages When You Die?

February 6, 2013

Filed under: Asset Protection,Estate Administration,Estate Recovery — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Christopher J. Berry @ 7:11 pm

Most people probably spend more time on Facebook than they’d like to admit — but what happens to your Facebook page when you die?

New Hampshire is one of the several states trying to figure that out. State Rep. Peter Sullivan introduced legislation to allow the executor of an estate control over the social networking pages of the dead. The New Hampshire House of Representatives voted last week to give Sullivan more time to write an amendment that begins a study of the issue.

(Related: Technology Companies and the Deceased)

Sullivan, a Democrat from Manchester, per the proposed bill, would allow control of someone’s Facebook, Twitter, and even Gmail to be passed to the executor of their estate after death. He believes that if if this bill passed, it would bridge a gap in policies of social media sites regarding posthumous users.

“This would give the families a sense of closure, a sense of peace. It would help prevent this form of bullying that continues even after someone dies and nobody is really harmed by it,” Sullivan said.

(Related: Ethical Wills and Leaving a Legacy Worth More Than Money)

Five other states, including Oklahoma, Idaho, Rhode Island, Indiana and Connecticut, have established legislation to regulate an individual’s digital presence post mortem.

Opponents of Sullivan’s bill hold that contracts and provisions between the social media user and the site already lay out what happens to the page once the user passes. Also, they believe the bill is unenforceable and incomplete, while others contend the issue would be better covered under federal law.

In 2010, a similar bill was sponsored by Oklahoma state legislator, Ryan Kiesel, called the Digital Property Management After Death Law. While Kisel supports state’s efforts to bring clarity to this issue, he is one of the believers that it is a case that should be eventually taken up by the federal government.

“Facebook and other online providers have changed their privacy policies to keep up with the times, but we still see a lot of flux within different sites like Facebook , Flickr, or Google, for example.” Keisel told ABC News. “The federal government should pass uniform laws to govern all digital assets because it is quite difficult for an estate to have to navigate endless numbers of digital policies postmortem.”

Now a civil rights activist, Kisel compared a digital legacy to the distribution of tangible assets after death.

(Related: Managing Digital Assets with Online Services)

“In Oklahoma, if you are administrator of the estate of a deceased person’s house and you find a box under their bed, you are well within your right to see what’s inside that box and if property is worth distributing, you should distribute it accordingly.” Kiesel told ABC News that the same idea goes for digital legacy.

Facebook recently celebrated the ninth Anniversary of its launch, and currently has over 1 billion active users. That number, up from just a million users in 2004, hints that the is likely an enormous number of Facebook pages that are currently occupied by the deceased.

As is, Facebook has created a memorial function allowing Facebook pages to become memorials after they have died.

“Please use this form to request the memorialization of a deceased person’s account,” the site reads. “We extend our condolences and appreciate your patience and understanding throughout this process.”

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/facebook-death-172350356.html

Marc H. Wander is a partner of the Bloomfield Hills law firm of Witzke, Berry, Carter &Wander, PLLC. Marc has been licensed to practice law in Michigan since 1992. Marc’s practice is devoted to estate planning and business succession planning.  Marc is a member of the Probate and Estate Planning Section of the State Bar of Michigan and is a prior Chairperson of the Oakland County Bar Association Tax Committee. He is a frequent continuing education speaker to insurance agents, financial advisors, CPA’s and financial industry organizations. He has also been heard on WJR Radio. Follow Marc on Twitter @MarcWander

Technology Companies and the Deceased

January 8, 2013

Filed under: Estate Planning,Estate Recovery — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Christopher J. Berry @ 5:54 pm

With so much of our lives online these days, many are curious as to what exactly happens to your digital stuff when you die? Currently, neither the U.S. nor Canada have consistent laws that treat digital data and accounts like physical goods, to be distributed via an estate plan after death.

Too often families are caught between estate laws (which grant them access to digital data) and privacy laws (which would forbid it). Some people create “social media wills” or share their passwords with a trusted person, while others use commercial services like LegacyLocker.com and SecureSafe.com, which allow people to store their account information in one place.

(Read more: Why Your Clients Should Be Concerned With the Federal “Death Tax”)

Without access to passwords and account details for the deceased, families must work within the guidelines of each individual tech company to gain access to their loved ones’ data. This can be a difficult process because most companies approach these situations differently.

This is a guide to navigate how some major internet companies handle the accounts of the deceased as of the end of 2012.

Google

  • Won’t disclose passwords for Gmail or for its social network, Google+, or transfer ownership of an account.
  • Won’t deactivate an account without a court order.
  • May provide contents of a dead user’s account if family mails or faxes proof of the death and family connection, and family meets additional legal requirements such as an order from a U.S. court.
  • Doesn’t offer Facebook-style “memorialization” for Google+ accounts.

(Read more: Estate Tax On the Rise, Don’t Panic, Plan)

Facebook

  • Won’t disclose passwords or transfer ownership of an account.
  • Will remove an account upon request of the family
  • Will “memorialize” accounts if notified (not necessarily by a family member) that the user has died. Memorialization prevents anybody from logging into the account but allows friends to post remembrances and memorials to the deceased person’s account.
  • Won’t disclose the contents of a deceased user’s account without a legal process.

Yahoo

  • Won’t disclose passwords.
  • If a user wants his family to have access to his account and after his death, Yahoo recommends he provide consent and his account information (username, password and/or answers to challenge questions) in his estate plans. Otherwise Yahoo won’t provide families data from the accounts of dead people.
  • Will deactivate an account if the estate provides a death certificate via fax or email.

(Read more: Why You Need to Put Your Living Together Agreement in Writing)

Microsoft

  • Won’t disclose passwords or transfer ownership of a Hotmail/Outlook.com account.
  • Doesn’t consider it a violation for surviving family that gets a court order or otherwise has authority from the deceased to use his or her password to log into the account.
  • Will deactivate an account upon the request of family.
  • May provide contents of a dead user’s email if family contacts Microsoft via email and provides other documentation, which depends on location.

Twitter

  • Won’t disclose passwords.
  • Doesn’t disclose account data without a court order in the U.S.
  • Doesn’t offer Facebook-style “memorialization” of accounts.
  • Will deactivate an account if a family contacts Twitter with a copy of death certificate, a notarized statement, and other details.

Tumblr

  • Won’t disclose passwords or transfer ownership of an account.
  • Will remove an account from public view if requested by immediate family.
  • Won’t disclose account data without a court order in the U.S.
  • Doesn’t offer “memorialization” of accounts.

LinkedIn

  • Won’t disclose passwords for accounts, or transfer ownership of an account.
  • Allows others (even beyond family members or executors) to report the death of a member, which causes the account and its data to be hidden from public view. People reporting deceased members usually must know the email address associated with the deceased person’s account.
  • If a family specifically requests it, will delete an account and all of its data.
  • Will not provide account data to others, including family members, unless required by a court.
  • Doesn’t offer Facebook-style “memorialization” for accounts.


Read more: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/01/04/what-to-do-online-when-a-loved-one-dies/

Marc H. Wander is a partner of the Bloomfield Hills law firm of Witzke, Berry, Carter &Wander, PLLC. Marc has been licensed to practice law in Michigan since 1992. Marc’s practice is devoted to estate planning and business succession planning.  Marc is a member of the Probate and Estate Planning Section of the State Bar of Michigan and is a prior Chairperson of the Oakland County Bar Association Tax Committee. He is a frequent continuing education speaker to insurance agents, financial advisors, CPA’s and financial industry organizations. He has also been heard on WJR Radio. Follow Marc on Twitter @MarcWander


Subscribe

Contact us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Our Newsletter

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Subscribe by email:
For Email Newsletters you can trust

Recent Posts



Archives



Categories



Blogroll
  • Michigan Elder Law Attorneys & Lawyers | Michigan Elder Law Center
  • Michigan Estate Planning Lawyers & Attorneys
  • Tulsa Estate Planning Blog