Why Your Clients Should Be Concerned With the Federal “Death Tax”

December 3, 2012

Filed under: Business Planning,Estate Taxes and Lifetime Gifts,Federal Estate Tax,Living Trust — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Christopher J. Berry @ 3:43 pm

 

Marc H. Wander is a partner of the Bloomfield Hills law firm of Witzke, Berry, Carter &Wander, PLLC. Marc has been licensed to practice law in Michigan since 1992. Marc’s practice is devoted to estate planning and business succession planning.  Marc is a member of the Probate and Estate Planning Section of the State Bar of Michigan and is a prior Chairperson of the Oakland County Bar Association Tax Committee. He is a frequent continuing education speaker to insurance agents, financial advisors, CPA’s and financial industry organizations. He has also been heard on WJR Radio. Follow Marc on Twitter @MarcWander

Bookmark and Share

Comments (0)

Estate Tax Law and Expirations On the Horizon

October 2, 2012

Filed under: Estate Planning,Federal Estate Tax — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , — Christopher J. Berry @ 10:30 pm

Among the plethora of Bush era tax cut and sequester debates, Congress must also address the expiration of the current estate tax law before the year’s end. As it stands, the federal estate tax exemption is set at $5.12 million and estates valued over this amount will be taxed at 35 percent. If no action is taken by Congress, the exemption will revert to $1 million and the estate tax rate will be 55 percent in 2013. It is estimated that 52,500 estates will be affected in the event Congress fails to act.

Business and farm lobbyists are fighting to rein in the estate tax, with many hoping to have the tax eliminated. In a full-force effort, they are trying to persuade Congress that resources needed for investment are being drained due to the constant changes in the estate tax rate, in recent years.

The GOP agrees, on the basis that decreasing the exemption and raising taxes on job creators in this economy rivals common sense. On the flipside, many Democrats repeatedly assert that in order to cut the deficit, the estate tax should return to the 2009 levels of a 45 percent rate for estates with a $3.5 million exemption.

Long-term and estate planning is subject to dramatic fluctuation if the estate tax plan expires without action. Currently, the federal unused spousal exclusion is portable, meaning, if one spouse dies and does not use all of the exclusion, the surviving spouse can combine the remaining amount with his or her exclusion. Also at risk of expiration, is the portability of the federal spousal exclusion in the event that the estate tax sunsets.

Witzke, Berry, Carter & Wander PLLC is keeping a close eye on the ongoing debates and how any estate tax decisions may affect you and your clients.

Mr. Witzke practices in the areas of estate and gift tax planning, financial planning, retirement planning, charitable giving, elder law, and small business planning. He focuses on helping clients grow, protect, and transfer wealth efficiently. Mr. Witzke is a past president and board member of the Financial Planning Association of Michigan, a member of the board of directors for Leadership Oakland, and a member of the planned giving advisory committees of Wayne State University and the Community House in Birmingham. Follow Mr. Witzke on Twitter @gr8estatelawyer.

Bookmark and Share

Comments (0)

Five Ways to Bungle Trust Administration in Michigan

May 26, 2011

Filed under: Do It Yourself Estate Planning Gone Wrong,Estate Administration,Federal Estate Tax,Probate,Probate Litigation — Christopher J. Berry @ 7:34 pm

Estate planning with revocable living trusts answer at least three main questions which includes: Who gets what?  How do you minimize settlement costs, such as probate and estate taxes? And, who is in control after the trustmaker passes away?

Barron’s has a great article entitled “The Five Biggest Ways to Bungle a Trust” that describes many of the mistakes that do-it-yourselfers face when they go at trust administration alone.  As Michigan trust administration and Oakland county probate lawyers, we are often brought in to clean up theses messes.

The first way people screw up trust administration involves keeping faulty records.  Generally trustees in Michigan must provide at least annual accountings to the beneficiaries.  Often, these accountings are slapped together at the last minute by an overwhelmed trustee.  As Michigan trust administration and estate administration lawyers, we professionally manage this process for our clients.  Whether we handle it in-house or outsource it to highly qualified CPA’s, our client’s understand that it’s professionally done and the beneficiaries of the trust appreciate the clarity.

Another way that trustees botch the trust administration process is by failing to diversify the trust assets.  It may be tempting to sit on a big chunk of a single stock, but often times, as prudent investors, it’s important for the trustee to diversify the portfolio so as to minimize risk for the beneficiaries.

Yet another trustee issue we see is that of biased distributions.  Trustees owe a fiduciary duty to the current beneficiaries and the remaindermen.  Therefore, a trustee cannot favor one beneficiary over another or allow any personal bias into the decision making.

The fourth area we, as Oakland county trust administration lawyers, see trustees making poor judgements is in the concept of the trustee expecting a payday.   Trustees, when acting without the aid of an trust administration attorney, often expect at the end of the day they will get a windfall for the efforts, when in reality, more often than not, they are only entitled to reasonable expenses and fees.  Quite often this is a source of probate or trust litigation.

Lastly, as a trustee acting alone, often times we’ll see that they have a false sense of safety.  A trustee acting without experienced Michigan trust administration counsel can feel that there is an entitlement and honor in serving the role of trustee at the other beneficiaries will defer to any judgements or decisions you make.  This generally cannot be further from the truth.  Quite often beneficiaries are looking for any little mistake a trustee makes, even in the best of families.

 

Bookmark and Share

Comments (0)

Do Estate Taxes Even Matter?

January 11, 2011

Filed under: Federal Estate Tax — Christopher J. Berry @ 9:52 pm

With all this Federal Estate Tax discussion the past few weeks, there was an interesting article in the NY Times asking if the Federal Estate Taxes even mattered?  You can read the article at Do Estate Taxes Matter?

Bookmark and Share

Comments (0)

TRUIRJCA, TRA, and DSUEA | Estate Planning Alphabet Soup

Filed under: Federal Estate Tax — Christopher J. Berry @ 1:25 pm

With the new estate tax rules that have ben recently passed the estate planning world is waving goodbye to one acronym and welcoming in a few more.  Good by to EGTRRA, which was the Economic Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act that was signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001.

Now we have TRUIRJCA, TRA, and DSUEA.

TRUIRJCA stands for the Tax Relief Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act.  This is the official name of the temporary Federal Estate Tax law that for two years extends and modifies the Bush era tax cuts.

The next key acronym is TRA, which some are using as an abbreviation for TRUIRJCA.  TRA stands for Tax Relief Act.  Julie Garber who wrote a blog post TRUIRJCA, TRA, and DSUEA-New Estate Planning Acronyms You Need to Know Now, much prefers TRA over TRUIRJCA.

The last key acronym is DSUEA, which stands for Deceased Spouse’s Unused Exemption Amount.  This acronym refers to the new portability concept included in the new rules.

Image: jscreationzs / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Bookmark and Share

Comments (0)

2011 Time to Revisit Your Estate Planning Documents

December 31, 2010

Filed under: Estate Planning,Federal Estate Tax — Christopher J. Berry @ 8:02 pm

With 2011 on our doorstep, its time to revisit your estate planning documents.  With much of the uncertainty over the estate tax wrapped up, for two years at least, many people had postponed getting their estate planning done and now that barrier to estate planning is removed.

So, as the boston.com article, Time to revisit your estate planning documents, mentions, why is now the right time?  One of the provisions signed by Obama is setting the estate tax exemption amount for the next two years as well as an increase in the lifetime gift tax exemption, both to $5 million.

So while, this higher exemption amount is good news, and now is a great time to update your estate planning documents, keep in mind that this provision is only for a  period of two years.  The new rules are set to change again in 2013.

Bookmark and Share

Comments (0)

Billionaire Dies, No Taxes For Uncle Sam

July 31, 2010

Filed under: Federal Estate Tax — Christopher J. Berry @ 9:30 pm

As a Detroit Federal Estate Tax estate planning lawyer, I keep up on the latest goings on with the Federal Estate Tax debate.

Dan Duncan, a billionaire, who made his money in oil and gas has recently passed away. Forbes magazine had him listed as the 74th wealthiest person in the world.  His estate was valued at $9 billion.  Had he lived until Jan 1, 2011, his estate may have paid up to 55% of that $9 billion to the United States government.  Instead, because of congress’ failure to address the Federal Estate Tax, there is no estate tax due.

The United States has had a Federal Estate Tax since 1916.  When Rockefeller died in 1937, his estate had paid a 70% tax according to a nytimes.com article.

It will be interesting to see if Congress acts before we go reach 2011.  Will the estate tax exemption amount fall back to $1 million?

Bookmark and Share

Comments (0)

Older Posts »

Witzke Berry & Carter PLLC
Blog Home Firm Website Practice Areas Contact Us

Gift Taxes: What Your CPA Doesn’t Know

March 27, 2013

Filed under: Estate Taxes and Lifetime Gifts,Federal Estate Tax — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Christopher J. Berry @ 7:25 pm

Taxpayers who gifted substantial assets to family members last year could be in for bitter surprise this tax season: potential errors on federal gift-tax returns that may cost donors taxes on gifts that they thought were tax-free.

(Related: Brooklyn Court Dumps Marriage Contract In Unprecedented Action)

Many taxpayers rushed to give during the last months of 2012, afraid that Congress would scale back the $5.12 million gift-tax exemption to $1 million at year-end — and raise the tax rate on gifts exceeding that limit to 55% from 35%. But in the end, lawmakers decided to leave the exemption intact, and raised the rate only five percentage points, to 40%.

Adding to the problem, Form 709, the gift-tax return, is a potential trap for accountants, particularly when the taxpayer gave something other than securities or put the gift into a trust, common in 2012. Form 709 applies to gifts exceeding $13,000 in 2012. Filing incorrectly can result in a weighty tax bill for an individual who expected to pay no tax on a gift at all. Also, an error can saddle heirs with a surprise bill even decades after someone made them the gift.

(Related: Basic Estate Planning 101: What You Need to Know)

Unfortunately few accountants have experience with more complicated reporting on a gift-tax return. Most only know how to report smaller, annual gifts. But gifts of real estate or business interests — which were common last year — or anything besides stocks and bonds, are another story.

Graduate accounting programs used to train accountants to report more-complicated gift transactions, but some no longer do. Many professionals falter on Form 709, which requires an advanced knowledge of rules for two separate taxes: the gift tax and the “generation-skipping tax,” which imposes levies that wouldn’t otherwise be incurred when families leave assets to heirs who are a generation younger or more. Estate planners consider the generation-skipping tax to be exceptionally complicated.

(Related: Marriage and estate planning: How it affects you)

Many experts recommend that taxpayers have a lawyer review, if not prepare, the gift-tax return. The 709 is unique and many CPAs seem happy to have someone else do it.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887324373204578374792220436214-lMyQjAxMTAzMDIwMzEyNDMyWj.html?mod=wsj_valettop_email&goback=.gde_158792_member_225687483

Mr. Witzke practices in the areas of estate and gift tax planning, financial planning, retirement planning, LGBT civil rights, charitable giving, elder law, and small business planning. He focuses on helping clients grow, protect, and transfer wealth efficiently. Mr. Witzke is a past president and board member of the Financial Planning Association of Michigan, a member of the board of directors for Leadership Oakland, and a member of the planned giving advisory committees of Wayne State University and the Community House in Birmingham. Follow Mr. Witzke on Twitter @gr8estatelawyer.

Where Not To Die In 2013: State Estate and Inheritance Taxes

February 15, 2013

Filed under: Asset Protection,Estate Planning,Estate Taxes and Lifetime Gifts,Federal Estate Tax — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Christopher J. Berry @ 2:52 pm

Even with the new federal estate tax law, families in 21 states and the District of Columbia where separate state levies are still very concerned state estate and inheritance taxes.

While the fear factor of the federal estate tax is gone for the majority of those whom are wealthy, state estate and inheritance taxes are still a source of worry.

(Read more: Study reveals more middle-aged adults care for kids and aging parents)

State estate and inheritance taxes have been in constant flux over the last decade, and even more confusing, in some states, the level at which the tax kicks in has been changing (rising and falling).

Thanks to the fiscal cliff tax teal (the American Taxpayer Relief Act), the federal estate tax exemption of a generous $5 million per person, indexed for inflation, is now permanent. In 2013, up to $5.25 million of an individual’s estate will be exempt from federal estate tax, with a 40% tax rate applied to any excess over the exemption amount.

(Read more: Marriage and estate planning: How it affects you)

Contrastingly, states with estate taxes typically exempt $1 million or less per estate from their tax and impose a top rate of 16%. New York, for example, sets its exemption at $1 million. So the estate of a person dying in New York with $5.25 million would owe no federal tax, but would owe New York $420,800.

Six states levy only an inheritance tax, with the rate based on the relationship of the heir to the deceased and the taxes kicking in, in some instances, on the first dollar of bequest. Only Maryland and New Jersey impose both. Maryland imposes an estate tax of up to 16% above a $1 billion exemption, and a 10% inheritance tax on every dollar left to a niece. nephew, friend or partner, but no inheritance tax on money left to children, grandchildren, parents or siblings. Any estate tax owed is reduced by the inheritance tax paid. As in the federal system, bequests to a spouse are tax-free.

A trend is emerging to eliminate state estate taxes, or at least lessening the tax bite by increasing the amount exempt from the tax. Ohio no longer has an estate tax. Delaware falls of the list effectively July 1, 2013 when its current temporary estate tax expires. Indiana’s inheritance tax is repealed effective Jan. 1, 2022. Tennessee’s inheritance tax is repealed effective Jan. 1, 2016.

In Indiana, there is a gradual phase-out of the tax, starting with a 10% credit effective Jan. 1, 2013, and in Tennessee the amount exempt from the state inheritance tax is rising each year, from $1.25 million this year, to $2 million in 2014 and $5 million in 2015.

Maine’s exemption doubles to $2 million this year, while Rhode Island’s exemption goes up to $910,725 this year, up from $859,350 in 2012 as it’s indexed for inflation.

Connecticut is the only state going in the other direction. In 2011, it lowered the amount it exempts from its tax from $3.5 million to $2 million per estate. And Illinois is the most recent state to implement an estate tax — it resurrected an estate tax in 2011 with a $2 million exemption — now $4 million.

(Read more: 8 Life Stages of Estate Planning: Part 1)

North Carolina is the next state to watch our for. Recently elected Rep. Governor Pat McCrory made abolishing the state estate tax one of his campaign promises:

“North Carolina is now the only state in the Southeast with the death tax. This tax unfairly punishes those who would inherit their loved one’s possessions or business, forcing some families to sell off a small business or family farm just to pay the tax. As governor, [I] will fight to eliminate the death tax for North Carolinians.”

A technical provision of the federal estate tax law includes a deduction for state tax paid — instead of the pre-2001 state death tax credit, which permit states to share in the estate tax revenue the feds collected. For states hoping for a return to revenue sharing, research analyst at tax publisher CCH, James Walschlager, believes it’s possible that they will consider adding stand-alone taxes.

Above is an interactive map that shows the state by state estate and inheritance taxes in the United States.

Read more: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleaebeling/2013/01/28/where-not-to-die-in-2013/

Mr. Witzke practices in the areas of estate and gift tax planning, financial planning, retirement planning, LGBT civil rights, charitable giving, elder law, and small business planning. He focuses on helping clients grow, protect, and transfer wealth efficiently. Mr. Witzke is a past president and board member of the Financial Planning Association of Michigan, a member of the board of directors for Leadership Oakland, and a member of the planned giving advisory committees of Wayne State University and the Community House in Birmingham. Follow Mr. Witzke on Twitter @gr8estatelawyer.

The New Age Of Estate Planning

January 16, 2013

Filed under: Business Planning,Estate Planning,Estate Taxes and Lifetime Gifts,Federal Estate Tax — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Christopher J. Berry @ 4:02 pm

Estate planning lawyers worked themselves ragged to close out 2012 in preparation for the approaching fiscal cliff. Lawyers worked overtime during the holiday season to set up trusts and fund them with gifts that made maximum use of what was then the $5.12 million per person tax-free amount.

(Read more: “Pound Foolish” Author Warns Americans From Taking Foolish Financial Advice)

But in less than three pages in the 157-page law, Congress passed the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 or ATRA, and put to rest the looming uncertainty that had haunted wealthy taxpayers for the past 12 years. As it came to pass, ATRA did not adjust the amount you can pass tax-free during life or at death. On Jan. 11 the IRS announced that with the inflation adjustment, that amount will be $5.25 million in 2013 ($10.50 million for married couples).

(Read more: Living Together and Property Agreements)

With fewer people worrying about estate tax, lawyers are uncertain what their next career move will be. Clients are calling to ask if they did the right thing, expressing concern about whether they will have enough for themselves down the road and whether they gave too much away. Other residual work for lawyers in 2013 will include preparing gift tax returns for 2012 gifts, which are due on April 15.

(Read more: Saying ‘I Do’ to a Prenup)

Gift tax audits will begin in 2014, while the IRS challenges some of the cute text tricks used to leverage or pack even more into the lifetime exemption amount. But looking ahead, there is less work to be done. Some firms plan to engage in strategic planning, while others look for growth in the field of elder law, dealing with asset transfer and the quality of life as people age.

Read more: http://www.forbes.com/sites/deborahljacobs/2013/01/15/morphing-into-the-new-age-of-estate-planning/?goback=.gde_1701677_member_204612620

 

Mr. Witzke practices in the areas of estate and gift tax planning, financial planning, retirement planning, LGBT civil rights, charitable giving, elder law, and small business planning. He focuses on helping clients grow, protect, and transfer wealth efficiently. Mr. Witzke is a past president and board member of the Financial Planning Association of Michigan, a member of the board of directors for Leadership Oakland, and a member of the planned giving advisory committees of Wayne State University and the Community House in Birmingham. Follow Mr. Witzke on Twitter @gr8estatelawyer.


Subscribe

Contact us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Our Newsletter

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Subscribe by email:
For Email Newsletters you can trust

Recent Posts



Archives



Categories



Blogroll
  • Michigan Elder Law Attorneys & Lawyers | Michigan Elder Law Center
  • Michigan Estate Planning Lawyers & Attorneys
  • Tulsa Estate Planning Blog